The beauty of nature. Freely dancing around with no strings attached. Im glad that Im living, because if I were not I wouldnt be able to see this gorgeous world we live in.
So there's a way you can reduce the intensity of the phaser effect which I believe you can use a EQ before the phaser. The EQ would filter out the low frequencies so they do not get processed by the phaser. By using a high-pass filter you can set it at the desired cutoff frequency to remove the lows, or using a parametric EQ to carve out the low frequencies. The filtered signal is then sent to the phaser, which applies to the remaining mid and high frequencies.
The reverb creates a sense of depth and space in the mix. But I also think possibly a quantum mastering tool could help control the levels of specific frequency ranges and will help reduce the unwanted frequencies and prevent them from interfering with the mix. Also volume and effect automations would help control the levels of individual sounds and effects over time. This will help to avoid unwanted frequencies from becoming too dominant in the mix.
this is really nice. the melody is good, i'd suggest reducing the phaser's intensity and applying it only to the mid & high freqs thanks to a bandsplitter, while keeping the low frequencies dry. the birdsongs recording sounds mono; it's perfectly fine because it gives a cosy vibe to the soundscape - however, in the case you aim for a wider and deeper soundscape, you can add a quasar reverb with low wetness and use its LP and HP filters to avoid unwanted frequencies spilling all over the place
no... that's not what music theory is, music theory is something everyone needs to learn if they want to be any kind of musician. Ask Infyuthsion what it is and he'll pull out his eighty-pound dictionary and find it and school you, but music theory isn't an actual theory for some reason, it's just ground rules for music in general