really nice remix
Syntax:
There's 365 devices in this draft, that's one device per day in a year.
Create an account or Login to write a comment.
-
-
Together with the original the best what I´ve heard on this platform so far!
-
this is purely amazing. great job guys.
-
YEEEEEEES. So good, could imagine this on UKF
-
who knew wubs and dnb sounded so good
-
can we make feat with you
-
What the fuck is that one heisenberg that has 3 stereodetunes, 3 gravities, and 3 curves LOL
-
Oh no, that actually makes sense, sorry lol
-
Oh that was the original screech bass in the original
I probs overdid the sound design on that one LMAO
-
I was saying that because I've never seen anyone but a few others do that. I was just surprised lol @1trillionMPH @Zerod
-
-
dang how long did it take to make this? this is impressive!
-
Preferring this to the original version, I like the Syntax-ification. Sticking with the DNB core. It's not too reliant on the Vocal. Good use of tools.
-
how do you make a song?
-
This is heavenly. The bass gliss tho. Also the swaggiest drum and bass I've ever heard.
-
hi
-
Yo this is an insane remix dude!!! This blew me away! Fantastic Job
-
chiga chiga bong bong papapapapa
-
Ngl i could prob make the drums way bigger lmao
-
toms get a bit more love in the frequency boosts/cuts and then things like transitionary sweeps, crashes, rides, and orchestral hits all get their own specific adjustments as well
-
yeah what do we mean bigger here, draft size? you probably could because most of the mixing I do for drums is normalizing a kick and tuning everything on the machinist itself, along with some envelope slope/end adjustments, the curves are mostly there to remove everything under 20hz as I'm hyper anal about that
-
In fact Syntax could make the drums smaller, and it'd just sound as good. It's just about how you compress your drums, adjusting the volume and sidechain
-
